Piece 1's
My piece 2's consisted of a sticker poster mocked up with wax paper and separate cut outs to give the "sticker" illusion, however, if pursued, would most likely take form of an actual sticker poster.
My take away reminders consisted of an oil bird magnet to correspond with the foldable magnet usage, as well as bumper stickers to help spread the word.
The piece to correspond with the app was a mocked up key chain with a barcode leading you to the app itself.
To test these sets as a whole on some volunteers I set up a room where people could maneuver around them comfortably with labels and minimal speaking directions from me in the moment.
And this is how the room was set up in general with the poster in easy visual access, the pieces displayed and labeled on the table top with the exception of the hanging feather gloves on the far wall.
After my 4 testers acquainted themselves with the material I gave them these questions to answer.
Out of these three expansions:
Which were
you most intrigued by or attracted to?
Which was
the easiest for you to understand?
Which do you feel correlated the
best with the poster, without distracting from it?
Would you take the time to give these expansions attention
in a museum?
Would you consider these expansions to successfully support
the poster? Which do you find the most successful? Which do you find the least?
2nd pieces:
Which 2nd correlating
piece made you feel the most inspired about the need for change?
Which 2nd piece would
you be most inspired to participate in?
I had them respond in written form so they could easily and thoughtfully form their critique and opinion without pressure of direct confrontation. It also makes the process of revising my mock ups and making directional decisions when I can look back on feedback again and again.
Thorough the feedback I received, I gained a lot of perspective on what my testers responded the most positively to and what was most ineffective. The app was by far a winner amongst this group, with the feather gloves coming in a tight second in comparison to the foldable. Overall as a group found the feathers to be very intriguing, the foldable straight forward, but the app most successful and amusing. One of my testers said she found it to be successful in the way it "pulled at your heart strings but didn't make you want to turn away". The app was also successful in the way it attracted people with the technological aspect according to several testers.
As far as the piece 2's the sticker poster was a great favorite. Several mentioned how much they enjoyed the interactiveness of it and how "It makes you feel like you can impact the future!"
Through this testing process I think I decided to pursue the refinements of the app in relation to the expanding refinements of the sticker poster as well as the key chain.
Testing answers
Testing answers
MORGAN WEBB
Out of these three expansions:
Which were
you most intrigued by or attracted to?
I was most intrigued
by the app
Which was the easiest for you to understand?
They were all
incredibly easy to understand, but I would have to say the app.
Which do you feel correlated the best with the poster,
without distracting from it?
The foldable probably
correlates the best with the poster without being distracting, simply due to
the fact that it is so straight forward.
Would you take the time to give these expansions attention
in a museum?
Hell yes, because
Demore’ is ridiculous at what she does! J
Would you consider these expansions to successfully support
the poster? Which do you find the most successful? Which do you find the least?
These all support the
poster. I think the app is most successful due to our technology driven world.
Its hard to say which is the least because theyre all great.
2nd pieces:
Which 2nd correlating
piece made you feel the most inspired about the need for change?
I like the gloves
piece 2. I liked it because it was hands on.
Which 2nd piece would
you be most inspired to participate in?
I would participate
in all of these. I do like the idea that the app piece 2 is a keychain though.
It always reminds others about the event.
KARINA JOHNSON
Out of these three expansions:
Which were
you most intrigued by or attracted to?
I was most attracted
to the feathers/glove, but intrigued by the app. The feathers were a cool idea
and I understand the significance between them and the gloves, but I think w/o
looking at the app first I would have been confused as to the differences
between the words written on the blue/ black paper.
Which was the easiest for you to understand?
Easiest for me to
understand was the app. I liked there was interaction with the animals and the
symbols chosen to go with how we screwed up made it easy to understand. I also
like that the app has the posters main center piece /logo/ whatever you want to
call it has the home button. Also helps our society is very technology driven,
but they could also take the message home on their smart phone!
Which do you feel correlated the best with the poster,
without distracting from it?
The gloves distracted
the least. I love the app and how you get the information, but I find
technology sometimes distracting. The gloves intrigued by them and want to see
what’s at the end of the feathers, but I don’t feel as distracted.
Would you take the time to give these expansions attention
in a museum?
I would look at all
of the expansions in a museum- I love this stuff. The feathers are fun because
I am a child and want to play with them. App is fun because it is interactive
with touching the characters to learn about them. The foldable is cool too for
the fact you have everything written on little objects.
Would you consider these expansions to successfully support
the poster? Which do you find the most successful? Which do you find the least?
Yes they support the
poster. Most successful to support the poster was the app, yet at the same time
im like “oh technology.. must press button” For me the least supporting would
be the foldable just because it doesn’t intrigue me as much as the other two.
2nd pieces:
Which 2nd correlating
piece made you feel the most inspired about the need for change?
For the need for
change, the gloves 2nd piece because it was asking about all the
ways you could be helping the environment by using less oil.
Which 2nd piece would
you be most inspired to participate in?
Probably the sticker
poster- I like that it is almost like
little things people do to be conscious instead of saying “GO GREEN, SAVE THE
PLANET”- I feel like its more subtle, but it gets the point across.
HAYLEY DISNEY
Out of these three expansions:
Which were
you most intrigued by or attracted to?
I was most attracted
to the app because it was fun and interactive.
Which was the easiest for you to understand?
The app as the
material was presented on screen. AKA you just had to swipe to see it as
opposed to manipulate materials. Material was presented in a way that pulled at
your heart strings but it didn’t make you want to turn away. (like the
holocaust museum some stuff was so graphic you have to turn away without
reading it.)
Which do you feel correlated the best with the poster,
without distracting from it?
The app J
can you tell I liked it?
Would you take the time to give these expansions attention
in a museum?
… the app. It was my
favorite expantion. Also, children and adults would play w/ it. Technology
really draws people in.
Would you consider these expansions to successfully support
the poster? Which do you find the most successful? Which do you find the least?
I would say they all
do a good job of providing information to support the poster. The app was most
successful in my book. The foldable I felt was least effective.
2nd pieces:
Which 2nd correlating
piece made you feel the most inspired about the need for change?
Gloves piece 2!
Which 2nd piece would
you be most inspired to participate in?
Gloves! It makes you
feel like you can impact the future!
ANNA DIEMAS
Out of these three expansions:
Which were
you most intrigued by or attracted to?
I was more intrigued
by the app. It was very well put together and I learned the most from it.
Which was the easiest for you to understand?
Easiest to understand
was the app because the others took me a little to figure out how the
information was being portrayed.
Which do you feel correlated the best with the poster,
without distracting from it?
The app correlated
best with the poster because it is simple and straight forward.
Would you take the time to give these expansions attention
in a museum?
I would give the
glove attentions at a museum because it is interactive
Would you consider these expansions to successfully support
the poster? Which do you find the most successful? Which do you find the least?
The app was the most
successful and the foldable was the least.
2nd pieces:
Which 2nd correlating
piece made you feel the most inspired about the need for change?
The stickers because
they provided a take away which in turn provided accountability to
conservation.
Which 2nd piece would
you be most inspired to participate in?
I would be more
inspired to participate with the stickers.
No comments:
Post a Comment